Proposed Test Rule: ARIA required context role
Applicability
This rule applies to any HTML or SVG element that is included in the accessibility tree and has a WAI-ARIA 1.1 explicit semantic role with a required context role, except if the element has an implicit semantic role that is identical to its explicit semantic role.
Expectation
Each test target is the child in the accessibility tree of an element that has a semantic role that is one of the required context roles of the target element.
Assumptions
The rule assumes that the explicit role of the applicable elements is appropriate for their element. I.e. A heading incorrectly marked up with role="cell"
does not fail success criterion 1.3.1 Info and Relationships for not being in the context of a row
. Having an inappropriate role is itself an issue under 1.3.1 Info and Relationships, so in either scenario a failure of this rule means this success criterion is not satisfied.
Accessibility Support
- User agents do not all have the same accessibility tree. This can lead to different results for this rule, depending on which accessibility tree is used as input.
aria-owns
has limited support in some user agents.- There exist some combination of popular browsers and assistive technologies who do not announce correctly relationships based on a mix of implicit and explicit roles.
Background
The applicability of this rule is limited to the WAI-ARIA 1.1 Recommendation roles. The WAI-ARIA Graphics Module does not include any required context roles. The Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module (DPUB ARIA) 1.0 only has two roles with required context roles (doc-biblioentry
and doc-endnote
); both of them have issues with their use of role inheritance, and both of them are deprecated in the Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module (DPUB ARIA) 1.1 editor’s draft.
An example of an element that has an implicit semantic role that is identical to its explicit semantic role is a <li role="listitem">
element. These elements are not applicable because they have extra requirements and should thus be checked separately.
Being a child in the accessibility tree is different from being a child in the DOM tree. Some DOM nodes have no corresponding node in the accessibility tree (for example, because they are marked with role="presentation"
). A child in the accessibility tree can thus correspond to a descendant in the DOM tree. Additionally, the use of aria-owns
attribute can change the tree structure to something which is not a subtree of the DOM tree.
This rule is restricted to direct parent-child relation in the accessibility tree which is more strict than the definition of “owned element” in WAI-ARIA. This rule mimics, on the roles level, the content model of HTML.
Subclass roles of required context roles are not automatically included as possible required context roles. For example, the feed
role is not a possible required context role for listitem
, even though feed
is a subclass role of the list
role.
Some user agents try to correct missing required context roles or incorrect content model. This often results, for example, in an isolated list item being presented as part of a one-item list containing only itself. Therefore, most test cases contain several targets to try and circumvent these corrections in order to better demonstrate the issue.
Bibliography
Accessibility Requirements Mapping
1.3.1 Info and Relationships (Level A)
- Learn more about 1.3.1 Info and Relationships
- Required for conformance to WCAG 2.0 and later on level A and higher.
- Outcome mapping:
- Any
failed
outcomes: success criterion is not satisfied - All
passed
outcomes: success criterion needs further testing - An
inapplicable
outcome: success criterion needs further testing
- Any
Input Aspects
The following aspects are required in using this rule.
Test Cases
Passed
Passed Example 1
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role, list
, expressed as an explicit role.
<div role="list">
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</div>
Passed Example 2
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role, list
, expressed as an implicit role of ul
. Note that this test case does not satisfy Success Criterion 4.1.1 Parsing because the ul
element does not respect its content model.
<ul>
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</ul>
Passed Example 3
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role even though they are not its children in DOM. The presentational node is not included in the accessibility tree.
<div role="list">
<div role="presentation">
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</div>
</div>
Passed Example 4
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role even though they are not its DOM descendants. The aria-owns
attribute is used to alter the accessibility tree and place the target elements in their required context role.
<div role="list" aria-owns="item1 item2"></div>
<div id="item1" role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div id="item2" role="listitem">List item 2</div>
Passed Example 5
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role even though they are not its DOM children. The aria-owns
attribute is used to alter the accessibility tree and place the target elements in their required context role.
<div role="list" aria-owns="item1 item2">
<div role="navigation">
<div id="item1" role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div id="item2" role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</div>
</div>
Passed Example 6
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role because the accessibility tree mimics the DOM tree across shadow boundaries.
<div id="host" role="list"></div>
<script>
const host = document.querySelector('#host')
const root = host.attachShadow({ mode: 'open' })
root.innerHTML = '<div role="listitem">List item 1</div> <div role="listitem">List item 2</div>'
</script>
Failed
Failed Example 1
This element with an explicit role of listitem
is not a child in the accessibility tree of an element with its required context role.
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
Failed Example 2
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are not children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role, but of an element with the tabpanel
role.
<div role="list">
<div role="tabpanel">
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</div>
</div>
Failed Example 3
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are not children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role. They are instead children in the accessibility tree of the div
with an aria-live
attribute; even though this div
has no role, it has a global ARIA attribute and is thus included in the accessibility tree.
<div role="list">
<div aria-live="polite">
<div role="listitem">List item 1</div>
<div role="listitem">List item 2</div>
</div>
</div>
Failed Example 4
These elements with an explicit role of listitem
are not children in the accessibility tree of an element with their required context role because explicit parent-child relation in the accessibility tree (set by aria-owns
) does not cross shadow boundaries.
<div role="list" aria-owns="item1 item2"></div>
<div id="host"></div>
<script>
const host = document.querySelector('#host')
const root = host.attachShadow({ mode: 'open' })
root.innerHTML = '<div id="item1" role="listitem">List item 1</div> <div id="item2" role="listitem">List item 2</div>'
</script>
Inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 1
This element with an explicit role of listitem
is not included in the accessibility tree.
<div role="listitem" style="display:none;">List item 1</div>
Inapplicable Example 2
There is no element with an explicit role.
<ul>
<li>List item 1</li>
</ul>
Inapplicable Example 3
This section
element with an explicit role of doc-abstract
has a role from the Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module (DPUB ARIA) 1.0, not the WAI-ARIA 1.1 Recommendation.
<section role="doc-abstract" aria-label="Abstract">
<p>Accessibility of web content requires semantic information about widgets, structures, and behaviors …</p>
</section>
Inapplicable Example 4
There is no element whose role has required context role because the header
role does not have one.
<div role="header" aria-level="1">Hello!</div>
<p>Welcome to my homepage!</p>
Inapplicable Example 5
There is no element with an explicit role different from its implicit role. This li
element has an explicit role of listitem
which is identical to its implicit role.
<ul>
<li role="listitem">List item 1</li>
</ul>
Glossary
Explicit Semantic Role
The explicit semantic role of an element is determined by its role attribute (if any).
The role attribute takes a list of tokens. The explicit semantic role is the first valid role in this list. The valid roles are all non-abstract roles from WAI-ARIA Specifications. If the element has no role attribute, or if it has one with no valid role, then this element has no explicit semantic role.
Other roles may be added as they become available. Not all roles will be supported in all assistive technologies. Testers are encouraged to adjust which roles are allowed according to the accessibility support base line. For the purposes of executing test cases in all rules, it should be assumed that all roles are supported by assistive technologies so that none of the roles fail due to lack of accessibility support.
Focusable
Elements that can become the target of keyboard input as described in the HTML specification of focusable and can be focused.
Implicit Semantic Role
The implicit semantic role of an element is a pre-defined value given by the host language which depends on the element and its ancestors.
Implicit roles for HTML and SVG, are documented in the HTML accessibility API mappings (working draft) and the SVG accessibility API mappings (working draft).
Included in the accessibility tree
Elements included in the accessibility tree of platform specific accessibility APIs are exposed to assistive technologies. This allows users of assistive technology to access the elements in a way that meets the requirements of the individual user.
The general rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree are defined in the core accessibility API mappings. For native markup languages, such as HTML and SVG, additional rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree can be found in the HTML accessibility API mappings (working draft) and the SVG accessibility API mappings (working draft).
For more details, see examples of included in the accessibility tree.
Programmatically hidden elements are removed from the accessibility tree. However, some browsers will leave focusable elements with an aria-hidden
attribute set to true
in the accessibility tree. Because they are hidden, these elements are considered not included in the accessibility tree. This may cause confusion for users of assistive technologies because they may still be able to interact with these focusable elements using sequential keyboard navigation, even though the element should not be included in the accessibility tree.
Marked as decorative
An element is marked as decorative if one or more of the following conditions is true:
- it has an explicit role of
none
orpresentation
; or - it is an
img
element with analt
attribute whose value is the empty string (alt=""
), and with no explicit role.
Elements are marked as decorative as a way to convey the intention of the author that they are pure decoration. It is different from the element actually being pure decoration as authors may make mistakes. It is different from the element being effectively ignored by assistive technologies as rules such as presentational roles conflict resolution may overwrite this intention.
Elements can also be ignored by assistive technologies if they are programmatically hidden. This is different from marking the element as decorative and does not convey the same intention. Notably, being programmatically hidden may change as users interact with the page (showing and hiding elements) while being marked as decorative should stay the same through all states of the page.
Namespaced Element
An element with a specific namespaceURI value from HTML namespaces. For example an “SVG element” is any element with the “SVG namespace”, which is http://www.w3.org/2000/svg
.
Namespaced elements are not limited to elements described in a specification. They also include custom elements. Elements such as a
and title
have a different namespace depending on where they are used. For example a title
in an HTML page usually has the HTML namespace. When used in an svg
element, a title
element has the SVG namespace instead.
Outcome
An outcome is a conclusion that comes from evaluating an ACT Rule on a test subject or one of its constituent test target. An outcome can be one of the three following types:
- Inapplicable: No part of the test subject matches the applicability
- Passed: A test target meets all expectations
- Failed: A test target does not meet all expectations
Note: A rule has one passed
or failed
outcome for every test target. When there are no test targets the rule has one inapplicable
outcome. This means that each test subject will have one or more outcomes.
Note: Implementations using the EARL10-Schema can express the outcome with the outcome property. In addition to passed
, failed
and inapplicable
, EARL 1.0 also defined an incomplete
outcome. While this cannot be the outcome of an ACT Rule when applied in its entirety, it often happens that rules are only partially evaluated. For example, when applicability was automated, but the expectations have to be evaluated manually. Such “interim” results can be expressed with the incomplete
outcome.
Programmatically Hidden
An HTML element is programmatically hidden if either it has a computed CSS property visibility
whose value is not visible
; or at least one of the following is true for any of its inclusive ancestors in the flat tree:
- has a
hidden
attribute; or - has a computed CSS property
display
ofnone
; or - has an
aria-hidden
attribute set totrue
Note: Contrarily to the other conditions, the visibility
CSS property may be reverted by descendants.
Semantic Role
The semantic role of an element is determined by the first of these cases that applies:
- Conflict If the element is marked as decorative, but the element is included in the accessibility tree; or would be included in the accessibility tree when it is not programmatically hidden, then its semantic role is its implicit role.
- Explicit If the element has an explicit role, then its semantic role is its explicit role.
- Implicit The semantic role of the element is its implicit role.
This definition can be used in expressions such as “semantic button
” meaning any element with a semantic role of button
.
WAI-ARIA specifications
The WAI ARIA Specifications group both the WAI ARIA W3C Recommendation and ARIA modules, namely:
- Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.1
- WAI-ARIA Graphics Module 1.0
- Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module 1.0
Note: depending on the type of content being evaluated, part of the specifications might be irrelevant and should be ignored.
Implementations
This section is not part of the official rule. It is populated dynamically and not accounted for in the change history or the last modified date.
Implementation | Consistency | Complete | Report |
---|---|---|---|
Alfa | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
Axe-core | Partially-consistent | Yes | View Report |
QualWeb | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
SortSite | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
Changelog
This is the first version of this ACT rule.