Test Rule: Form field has non-empty accessible name
Applicability
This rule applies to any element that is included in the accessibility tree, and that has one of the following semantic roles: checkbox
, combobox
(select
elements), listbox
, menuitemcheckbox
, menuitemradio
, radio
, searchbox
, slider
, spinbutton
, switch
, textbox
.
Expectation
Each target element has an accessible name that is not empty (""
).
Assumptions
There are currently no assumptions
Accessibility Support
- Certain assistive technologies can be set up to ignore the title attribute, which means that to some users the title attribute will not act as an accessible name.
- Several assistive technologies have a functionality to list all form fields on a page, including the
disabled
ones. Therefore this rule is still applicable todisabled
form fields. If an assistive technology consistently ignoresdisabled
form fields in all its interactions, then it is possible to have adisabled
form field with no accessible name without creating accessibility issues for the user. - Implementation of Presentational Roles Conflict Resolution varies from one browser or assistive technology to another. Depending on this, some elements can have one of the applicable semantic roles and fail this rule with some technology but users of other technologies would not experience any accessibility issue.
- Elements with the
option
role are not tested in this rule because they do not meet the definition of a User interface component. If these elements are presented as user interface components, these need to be tested separately from this rule.
Background
The list of roles in the applicability is derived by taking all the roles from WAI-ARIA Specifications that:
- have semantic roles that inherit from the abstract
input
orselect
role, and - do not have a required context role that itself inherits from one of those roles.
Note that this rule does not test other control-like roles such as button
and menuitem
, because these do not inherit from input
or select
. These should be tested separately.
This rule does not map to 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions as there are sufficient techniques within 3.3.2 that don’t need the elements to have an accessible name. For example “G131: Providing descriptive labels” AND “G162: Positioning labels to maximize predictability of relationships” would be sufficient.
Bibliography
- Understanding Success Criterion 4.1.2: Name, Role, Value
- H91: Using HTML form controls and links
- H44: Using label elements to associate text labels with form controls
- H65: Using the title attribute to identify form controls when the label element cannot be used
Accessibility Requirements Mapping
4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (Level A)
- Learn more about 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value
- Required for conformance to WCAG 2.0 and later on level A and higher.
- Outcome mapping:
- Any
failed
outcomes: success criterion is not satisfied - All
passed
outcomes: success criterion needs further testing - An
inapplicable
outcome: success criterion needs further testing
- Any
Input Aspects
The following aspects are required in using this rule.
Test Cases
Passed
Passed Example 1
This input
element has an accessible name because of its programmatic label.
<label>
first name
<input />
</label>
Passed Example 2
This input
element has an accessible name because of its aria-label
attribute.
<div>last name</div>
<input aria-label="last name" disabled />
Passed Example 3
This select
element has an accessible name because of its programmatic label.
<label for="country">Country</label>
<select id="country">
<option>England</option>
<option>Scotland</option>
<option>Wales</option>
<option>Northern Ireland</option>
</select>
Passed Example 4
This textarea
element has an accessible name because of its aria-labelledby
attribute.
<div id="country">Country</div>
<textarea aria-labelledby="country"></textarea>
Passed Example 5
This input
element has an accessible name because of its placeholder
attribute.
Note: While the placeholder
attribute is sufficient to provide an accessible name, a visible label that does not disappear when a user starts to enter data is still required for success criterion 3.3.2 Labels or Instructions.
<input placeholder="Your search query" /> <button type="submit">search</button>
Passed Example 6
This semantic combobox
element has an accessible name because of its aria-label
attribute.
<div>Country</div>
<div aria-label="country" role="combobox" aria-disabled="true">England</div>
Passed Example 7
This semantic checkbox
element has the text content as its accessible name.
<div role="checkbox">I agree to the terms and conditions.</div>
Failed
Failed Example 1
This input
element does not have an attribute that gives an accessible name to it.
<div>last name</div>
<input />
Failed Example 2
This disabled input
element does not have an attribute that gives an accessible name to it.
<input disabled />
Failed Example 3
This input
element has an empty (""
) accessible name because the space in the aria-label
attribute value is trimmed.
<input aria-label=" " />
Failed Example 4
This select
element has an empty (""
) accessible name because the div
has no text content.
<div id="country"></div>
<select aria-labelledby="country">
<option>England</option>
</select>
Failed Example 5
This semantic textbox
element has an empty (""
) accessible name. The parent label
element does not give it an accessible name, this only works for native form fields.
<label>
first name
<div role="textbox"></div>
</label>
Failed Example 6
This semantic textbox
element has an empty (""
) accessible name. The label
element does not give it an accessible name, this only works for native form fields.
<label for="firstname">first name</label>
<div role="textbox" id="firstname"></div>
Failed Example 7
This semantic textbox
element has an empty (""
) accessible name. The text content of the element serves as its value, not as an accessible name.
<div role="textbox">first name</div>
Inapplicable
Inapplicable Example 1
This input
element is not included in the accessibility tree because of its style
attribute which sets display
to none
.
<input aria-label="firstname" style="display:none;" />
Inapplicable Example 2
This input
element is not included in the accessibility tree because of its aria-hidden
attribute.
<input disabled aria-hidden="true" aria-label="firstname" />
Inapplicable Example 3
This select
element is not included in the accessibility tree because it is disabled
and has a role
attribute value of “none”.
<select role="none" disabled>
<option value="volvo">Volvo</option>
<option value="saab">Saab</option>
<option value="opel">Opel</option>
</select>
Glossary
Accessible Name
The accessible name is the programmatically determined name of a user interface element that is included in the accessibility tree.
The accessible name is calculated using the accessible name and description computation.
For native markup languages, such as HTML and SVG, additional information on how to calculate the accessible name can be found in HTML Accessibility API Mappings 1.0, Accessible Name and Description Computation (working draft) and SVG Accessibility API Mappings, Name and Description (working draft).
For more details, see examples of accessible name.
Note: As per the accessible name and description computation, each element always has an accessible name. When no accessible name is provided, the element will nonetheless be assigned an empty (""
) one.
Note: As per the accessible name and description computation, accessible names are flat string trimmed of leading and trailing whitespace. Notably, it is not possible for a non-empty accessible name to be composed only of whitespace since these must be trimmed.
Attribute value
The attribute value of a content attribute set on an HTML element is the value that the attribute gets after being parsed and computed according to specifications. It may differ from the value that is actually written in the HTML code due to trimming whitespace or non-digits characters, default values, or case-insensitivity.
Some notable case of attribute value, among others:
- For enumerated attributes, the attribute value is either the state of the attribute, or the keyword that maps to it; even for the default states. Thus
<input type="image" />
has an attribute value of eitherImage Button
(the state) orimage
(the keyword mapping to it), both formulations having the same meaning; similarly, “an input element with atype
attribute value ofText
” can be either<input type="text" />
,<input />
(missing value default), or<input type="invalid" />
(invalid value default). - For boolean attributes, the attribute value is
true
when the attribute is present andfalse
otherwise. Thus<button disabled>
,<button disabled="disabled">
and<button disabled="">
all have adisabled
attribute value oftrue
. - For attributes whose value is used in a case-insensitive context, the attribute value is the lowercase version of the value written in the HTML code.
- For attributes that accept numbers, the attribute value is the result of parsing the value written in the HTML code according to the rules for parsing this kind of number.
- For attributes that accept sets of tokens, whether space separated or comma separated, the attribute value is the set of tokens obtained after parsing the set and, depending on the case, converting its items to lowercase (if the set is used in a case-insensitive context).
- For
aria-*
attributes, the attribute value is computed as indicated in the WAI-ARIA specification and the HTML Accessibility API Mappings.
This list is not exhaustive, and only serves as an illustration for some of the most common cases.
The attribute value of an IDL attribute is the value returned on getting it. Note that when an IDL attribute reflects a content attribute, they have the same attribute value.
Explicit Semantic Role
The explicit semantic role of an element is determined by its role attribute (if any).
The role attribute takes a list of tokens. The explicit semantic role is the first valid role in this list. The valid roles are all non-abstract roles from WAI-ARIA Specifications. If the element has no role attribute, or if it has one with no valid role, then this element has no explicit semantic role.
Other roles may be added as they become available. Not all roles will be supported in all assistive technologies. Testers are encouraged to adjust which roles are allowed according to the accessibility support base line. For the purposes of executing test cases in all rules, it should be assumed that all roles are supported by assistive technologies so that none of the roles fail due to lack of accessibility support.
Focusable
Elements that can become the target of keyboard input as described in the HTML specification of focusable and can be focused.
Implicit Semantic Role
The implicit semantic role of an element is a pre-defined value given by the host language which depends on the element and its ancestors.
Implicit roles for HTML and SVG, are documented in the HTML accessibility API mappings (working draft) and the SVG accessibility API mappings (working draft).
Included in the accessibility tree
Elements included in the accessibility tree of platform specific accessibility APIs are exposed to assistive technologies. This allows users of assistive technology to access the elements in a way that meets the requirements of the individual user.
The general rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree are defined in the core accessibility API mappings. For native markup languages, such as HTML and SVG, additional rules for when elements are included in the accessibility tree can be found in the HTML accessibility API mappings (working draft) and the SVG accessibility API mappings (working draft).
For more details, see examples of included in the accessibility tree.
Programmatically hidden elements are removed from the accessibility tree. However, some browsers will leave focusable elements with an aria-hidden
attribute set to true
in the accessibility tree. Because they are hidden, these elements are considered not included in the accessibility tree. This may cause confusion for users of assistive technologies because they may still be able to interact with these focusable elements using sequential keyboard navigation, even though the element should not be included in the accessibility tree.
Marked as decorative
An element is marked as decorative if one or more of the following conditions is true:
- it has an explicit role of
none
orpresentation
; or - it is an
img
element with analt
attribute whose value is the empty string (alt=""
), and with no explicit role.
Elements are marked as decorative as a way to convey the intention of the author that they are pure decoration. It is different from the element actually being pure decoration as authors may make mistakes. It is different from the element being effectively ignored by assistive technologies as rules such as presentational roles conflict resolution may overwrite this intention.
Elements can also be ignored by assistive technologies if they are programmatically hidden. This is different from marking the element as decorative and does not convey the same intention. Notably, being programmatically hidden may change as users interact with the page (showing and hiding elements) while being marked as decorative should stay the same through all states of the page.
Outcome
An outcome is a conclusion that comes from evaluating an ACT Rule on a test subject or one of its constituent test target. An outcome can be one of the three following types:
- Inapplicable: No part of the test subject matches the applicability
- Passed: A test target meets all expectations
- Failed: A test target does not meet all expectations
Note: A rule has one passed
or failed
outcome for every test target. When there are no test targets the rule has one inapplicable
outcome. This means that each test subject will have one or more outcomes.
Note: Implementations using the EARL10-Schema can express the outcome with the outcome property. In addition to passed
, failed
and inapplicable
, EARL 1.0 also defined an incomplete
outcome. While this cannot be the outcome of an ACT Rule when applied in its entirety, it often happens that rules are only partially evaluated. For example, when applicability was automated, but the expectations have to be evaluated manually. Such “interim” results can be expressed with the incomplete
outcome.
Programmatic Label
Element L is a programmatic label of target element T if either:
- T is a labeled control of L; or
- L is referenced by ID in the
aria-labelledby
attribute of T.
For more details, see examples of programmatic label.
Note: a given element may have more than one programmatic label.
Programmatically Hidden
An HTML element is programmatically hidden if either it has a computed CSS property visibility
whose value is not visible
; or at least one of the following is true for any of its inclusive ancestors in the flat tree:
- has a
hidden
attribute; or - has a computed CSS property
display
ofnone
; or - has an
aria-hidden
attribute set totrue
Note: Contrarily to the other conditions, the visibility
CSS property may be reverted by descendants.
Semantic Role
The semantic role of an element is determined by the first of these cases that applies:
- Conflict If the element is marked as decorative, but the element is included in the accessibility tree; or would be included in the accessibility tree when it is not programmatically hidden, then its semantic role is its implicit role.
- Explicit If the element has an explicit role, then its semantic role is its explicit role.
- Implicit The semantic role of the element is its implicit role.
This definition can be used in expressions such as “semantic button
” meaning any element with a semantic role of button
.
Visible
Content perceivable through sight.
Content is considered visible if making it fully transparent would result in a difference in the pixels rendered for any part of the document that is currently within the viewport or can be brought into the viewport via scrolling.
For more details, see examples of visible.
WAI-ARIA specifications
The WAI ARIA Specifications group both the WAI ARIA W3C Recommendation and ARIA modules, namely:
- Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.1
- WAI-ARIA Graphics Module 1.0
- Digital Publishing WAI-ARIA Module 1.0
Note: depending on the type of content being evaluated, part of the specifications might be irrelevant and should be ignored.
Implementations
This section is not part of the official rule. It is populated dynamically and not accounted for in the change history or the last modified date.
Implementation | Consistency | Complete | Report |
---|---|---|---|
Alfa | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
Axe-core | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
QualWeb | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
SortSite | Consistent | Yes | View Report |
Changelog
This is the first version of this ACT rule.